Accordingly, the prosecution interrogated the defendant, the owner of the account, who confessed to what was attributed to her of assaulting religions and the Islamic religion, insulting his rituals and writings and insulting its symbols, and that she used to spread her atheistic ideas in this way in order to share those ideas with others.
The Public Prosecution office ordered the defendant's remand pending the case and sent her to an urgent trial.
While the Chief Public Prosecutor affirmed that the Public Prosecution, in its capacity as the representative of society in the matter of the criminal case, stresses respect for its religion and belief, indicating that undermining its sanctities by ridicule and sarcasm does not fall under the concept of freedom of opinion and expression, rather it is an infringement of the right of others to believe and an infringement of its values and constants. From this point of view, the Public Prosecution office holds criminal responsibility for the accused and everyone who comes to her abilities with such sinful practices.